Message168628
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Indeed I don't like the introduction of COMPILER_STACK_FRAME_SCALE.
> Re-using the existing infrastructure would be much easier to maintain.
> The default recursion limit is 1000, which should cover any non-pathological code, IMHO.
I submitted a new version with the scale lowered to 3.
Using a lower value (e.g. 1) however makes "test_extended_args" fail
(the test tries to compile an expression with 2500+ terms).
If it's ok to make that test to throw instead then the whole scaling
could be removed. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-08-20 07:00:37 | ag6502 | set | recipients:
+ ag6502, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, ggenellina, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, Mark.Shannon, francismb, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-08-20 07:00:15 | ag6502 | link | issue5765 messages |
2012-08-20 07:00:15 | ag6502 | create | |
|