Message 168575 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	skrah
Recipients	Arfrever, georg.brandl, loewis, mark.dickinson, meador.inge, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, skrah, vstinner
Date	2012-08-19.14:07:18
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1345385259.55.0.760172567528.issue13072@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Since actual removal is only scheduled for 4.0, I think user warnings can wait until 3.4. By then, we should have sorted out the struct format codes. In this scenario we would be sort of forced to use 'C', 'U' and 'W' as the new codes, while 'u' and 'w' would continue to linger in the array module for a while.

Since actual removal is only scheduled for 4.0, I think user warnings
can wait until 3.4.

By then, we should have sorted out the struct format codes. In this
scenario we would be sort of forced to use 'C', 'U' and 'W' as the
new codes, while 'u' and 'w' would continue to linger in the array
module for a while.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-08-19 14:07:39	skrah	set	recipients: + skrah, loewis, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, Arfrever, meador.inge, python-dev
2012-08-19 14:07:39	skrah	set	messageid: <1345385259.55.0.760172567528.issue13072@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-08-19 14:07:18	skrah	link	issue13072 messages
2012-08-19 14:07:18	skrah	create