Message167230
Well, really, the reason I'm deferring is to get the patch accepted, because it seems kind of unacceptable for standard library modules not to have full test coverage. So far, I don't see evidence that the issue has even been triaged. Of the three approaches, regex, cd, or decoration, which do you see as most likely to be accepted? I understand that cd might be common in some tests. But it also appears that, at least in test_filecmp, some pretty heinous practices are also common like piling a ridiculous number of asserts into one test method. (And I'll fix that, too.) I do really appreciate your advice, core developer or not. You are the only one providing advice here. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-08-02 15:12:28 | cbc | set | recipients:
+ cbc, chris.jerdonek |
2012-08-02 15:12:28 | cbc | set | messageid: <1343920348.8.0.813444677162.issue15518@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-08-02 15:12:28 | cbc | link | issue15518 messages |
2012-08-02 15:12:27 | cbc | create | |
|