Message166779
Chris, I'm not sure how to answer your questions. The more powerful and flexible, the better. There is no "must" here. I'm looking for a way to avoid the hacks coverage.py has used in the past to measure coverage in subprocesses. A language feature that allowed me to externally configure the interpreter to run some of my code first would allow me to do that. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-07-29 15:56:46 | nedbat | set | recipients:
+ nedbat, ncoghlan, pitrou, chris.jerdonek, serhiy.storchaka, bkabrda |
2012-07-29 15:56:46 | nedbat | set | messageid: <1343577406.61.0.728823361148.issue14803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-07-29 15:56:46 | nedbat | link | issue14803 messages |
2012-07-29 15:56:45 | nedbat | create | |
|