Author pitrou
Recipients chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date 2012-07-29.15:14:09
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1343574712.3388.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> I feel like it is already too large (it is over 1750 lines), and I did
> not want to create a third sibling test support module (there is also
> test/ that overlaps with  Do you think
> that the community would be open to refactoring into a
> package for Python 3.3?  This was meant to assist in increasing test
> coverage for Python 3.3 bugs.

That's too late for 3.3, IMO. Whether or not is too large
is a matter of taste (we have larger files in the stdlib; what makes annoying to work with is that it's a hodge-podge of utility
functions with little care for consistency). Unless we can clearly
separate it in thematic areas, making it a package would only make
finding stuff more difficult.
Date User Action Args
2012-07-29 15:14:10pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, chris.jerdonek
2012-07-29 15:14:09pitroulinkissue15403 messages
2012-07-29 15:14:09pitroucreate