Yes, exactly. I was not the one who posted the original bug report, but I
found it when I ran into the same problem. I was not exactly sure if the
original poster had the same issues as I had. I do know that my fix to the
code eliminated some code making the code a bit simpler. I could try to dig
up my fix and send it to you if you want.

~Carl

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:32 PM, André Cruz <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> André Cruz <andre@cabine.org> added the comment:
>
> As far as I can see, the patch does add some documentation changes. What
> exactly is missing?
>
> As for the bug, if I understood correctly, what you are saying is that
> when "ignore_continue" is True, and the server sends a 100 Continue
> response, the code will continue to try to read data from the server even
> though none is expected, is that right?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1346874>
> _______________________________________
>