Message164643
Hi,
> As I said in the other bug, symlinks handling in not fully specified
Yes. I've mostly submitted a bug report in case anybody else encounters the problem.
> At present I am not sure if having symlinks in a distribution makes sense
I agree.
In my case symlinks are being used to restructure a large legacy module into smaller packages. When creating sdists the symlinks are dereferenced on another developer's host (OSX) and all is well but they on my host (Linux) I get packages with broken symlinks.
> BTW the example you link to is not at all monkey-patching
My mistake. When I worked around this issue I did monkey-patch sdist. I also just wrapped the source path is os.path.readlink() before hardlinking. I think the approach in that link is a much better solution so I have referred to it instead.
-Ollie |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-07-04 11:05:20 | olliewalsh | set | recipients:
+ olliewalsh, eric.smith, tarek, eric.araujo, Arfrever |
2012-07-04 11:05:20 | olliewalsh | set | messageid: <1341399920.79.0.97360836082.issue15205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-07-04 11:05:20 | olliewalsh | link | issue15205 messages |
2012-07-04 11:05:19 | olliewalsh | create | |
|