Message164025
I'm not comfortable adding a dependency on inspect to the contextlib module, and I think it would be undesirable to have too many cases where the early validation is silently skipped.
While I like the idea of adding early signature validation to these APIs in principle, given the above concerns and the fact this probably crosses the line into "feature" territory, I think we want to wait until 3.4 and the introduction of a mechanism that adds introspection support to callables implemented in C.
That will likely involve moving the signature support somewhere lower in the module stack (perhaps to a private "_signature" module, with inspect remaining the official API), and will reduce the number of cases where pre-validation is skipped. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-26 01:02:42 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, Yury.Selivanov, yselivanov |
2012-06-26 01:02:41 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1340672561.73.0.12990485662.issue15185@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-06-26 01:02:40 | ncoghlan | link | issue15185 messages |
2012-06-26 01:02:39 | ncoghlan | create | |
|