Message163597
I believe the patch is incorrect. It changes self._acquire_restore into a no-op, claiming that lock_acquire_condition will correctly restore the lock's state.
However, lock_acquire_condition may fail (e.g. if the timeout is not strictly positive), in which case the lock's case isn't properly restored. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-23 12:29:15 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, georg.brandl, jcea, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, sbt |
2012-06-23 12:29:15 | loewis | set | messageid: <1340454555.27.0.105662537292.issue15139@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-06-23 12:29:14 | loewis | link | issue15139 messages |
2012-06-23 12:29:14 | loewis | create | |
|