Message 163411 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	kristjan.jonsson, pitrou, sbt
Date	2012-06-22.14:16:45
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1340374393.3366.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<1340373417.12.0.856957491986.issue15124@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Also, locks are normally uncontested. The unconstested case is the > one to optimize for. As such, the test cases are not artificial at > all. Ok. I don't have any problem with the patch in principle (I didn't read it in detail). I was just a bit surprised that you cared so much about performance of lock allocation. If you want the patch to go in 3.3, you will have to commit it before the beta release, which is very soon (this week-end I think).

> Also, locks are normally uncontested.  The unconstested case is the
> one to optimize for. As such, the test cases are not artificial at
> all.

Ok. I don't have any problem with the patch in principle (I didn't read
it in detail). I was just a bit surprised that you cared so much about
performance of lock allocation.

If you want the patch to go in 3.3, you will have to commit it before
the beta release, which is very soon (this week-end I think).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-06-22 14:16:46	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, sbt
2012-06-22 14:16:45	pitrou	link	issue15124 messages
2012-06-22 14:16:45	pitrou	create