Message162555
> Previously existing redundant functions could be
> deprecated in documentation.
As in, don't start a "deprecation cycle" (warning in 3.3, deprecated in 3.4, gone in 3.5), just document "consider using this other function instead"? That's probably worth doing. I wouldn't use the word "deprecated" though, I'd just suggest a "see also".
Maybe we could remove the redundant functions in 4.0. I'll put it on my wishlist :) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-06-09 04:23:42 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, gvanrossum, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray, neologix, Yury.Selivanov, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-06-09 04:23:42 | larry | set | messageid: <1339215822.62.0.268398625328.issue14626@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-06-09 04:23:42 | larry | link | issue14626 messages |
2012-06-09 04:23:41 | larry | create | |
|