Author vinay.sajip
Recipients giampaolo.rodola, maker, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, vinay.sajip
Date 2012-05-15.16:25:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1337099131.25.0.703330115786.issue11959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> So if we add a map argument to that and only pass it to socket if it
> is non-None, wouldn't that maintain backward compatibility with
> current asyncore behavior?

Sorry I was being a bit dense ... it's been a while since I looked at this. I think you are right that the base create_socket could be changed in this way. I'll work up a patch in my sandbox branch (for easier Rietveld integration).
History
Date User Action Args
2012-05-15 16:25:31vinay.sajipsetrecipients: + vinay.sajip, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, r.david.murray, maker
2012-05-15 16:25:31vinay.sajipsetmessageid: <1337099131.25.0.703330115786.issue11959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-05-15 16:25:30vinay.sajiplinkissue11959 messages
2012-05-15 16:25:30vinay.sajipcreate