Message160702
Because I was thinking about a specific case where I *could* configure how the subprocesses were invoked (launching a test server for a web application). It took Ned's comment to remind me of the original use case (i.e. coverage statistics for a subprocesses created by an arbitrary application, *not* a custom test harness).
What this would allow is the elimination of a whole class of ad hoc feature requests - any process global configuration setting with a Python API would automatically also receive a command line API (via -C) and an environment API (via PYTHONRUNFIRST).
Some existing options (like -Xfaulthandler) may never have been added if -C was available.
That's why I changed the issue title (and am now updating the specific suggestion). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-15 09:46:16 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, pitrou, nedbat, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-05-15 09:46:16 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1337075176.46.0.134983878976.issue14803@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-15 09:46:15 | ncoghlan | link | issue14803 messages |
2012-05-15 09:46:15 | ncoghlan | create | |
|