Message158742
> Perhaps because your system's memory allocator is extremely good (or buf is always very small), but b''.join() is far more robust.
> Another alternative is accumulating in a bytearray, since it uses overallocation for linear time appending.
I thought, that it was in special optimization, mentioned in the
python-dev, but could not find this in the code. Perhaps it had not been
implemented.
In this particular case, the bytes appending is performed only once (and
probably a lot of appending with b''). Exceptions are possible only in
pathological cases, for example when compressed data is much larger
uncompressed data. The current implementation uses `buf += data`, if
someone wants to change it, then it's not me. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-19 20:25:47 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, loewis, jcea, alanmcintyre, pitrou, nadeem.vawda |
2012-04-19 20:25:46 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue14371 messages |
2012-04-19 20:25:46 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|