This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author neologix
Recipients nadeem.vawda, neologix, pitrou, sbt
Date 2012-04-12.08:01:00
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM3xh9r-PG=O2z5EqDGNFrd2oQZw3Kd8tSTZrdWsACsndg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1334185656.37.0.476304514318.issue14548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
>> That's a problem indeed. Perhaps we need a global "fork lock" shared
>> between subprocess and multiprocessing?
>
> I did an atfork patch which included a (recursive) fork lock.  See
>
>    http://bugs.python.org/review/6721/show
>
> The patch included changes to multiprocessing and subprocess.  (Being able to acquire the lock when doing fd manipulation is quite useful.  For instance, the creation of Process.sentinel currently has a race which can mean than another process inherits the write end of the pipe.  That would cause Process.join() to wait till both processes terminate.)

Indeed, I had a look and it looked good.
I just had a couple minor comments, I'll try to get back to this later
today, or by the end of the week.

> Actually, for Finalizers I think it would be easier to just record and check the pid.

I'd prefer this too.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-04-12 08:01:00neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, pitrou, nadeem.vawda, sbt
2012-04-12 08:01:00neologixlinkissue14548 messages
2012-04-12 08:01:00neologixcreate