This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, jcea, ncoghlan, pitrou, ron_adam, scoder
Date 2012-04-09.17:17:40
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1333991532.3379.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <>
> As long as there is a way to access these fields directly from the
> struct (with the usual preprocessor conditional), I don't think Cython
> will actually start to use the PyErr_[GS]etExcInfo() functions in
> CPython - simply for performance reasons.

Isn't this premature optimization? Do you have any workload where you
measured a performance degradation?
Date User Action Args
2012-04-09 17:17:41pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, scoder, ron_adam, benjamin.peterson, Mark.Shannon, Jim.Jewett
2012-04-09 17:17:40pitroulinkissue13897 messages
2012-04-09 17:17:40pitroucreate