This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Mark.Shannon
Recipients Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, jcea, ncoghlan, pitrou, ron_adam, scoder
Date 2012-04-09.15:56:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1333987017.14.0.700701013169.issue13897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
3rd party code should not be accessing fields in the threadstate object,
but without the accessors proposed in issue 14098 there may be no alternative.

Once the patch for issue 14098 has been applied it, would it then be acceptable to remove the surperfluous fields from the frameobject?
The logic for accessing sys.exc_info can be moved to into the new 
accessor fucntions.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-04-09 15:56:57Mark.Shannonsetrecipients: + Mark.Shannon, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, ron_adam, benjamin.peterson, Jim.Jewett
2012-04-09 15:56:57Mark.Shannonsetmessageid: <1333987017.14.0.700701013169.issue13897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-04-09 15:56:56Mark.Shannonlinkissue13897 messages
2012-04-09 15:56:56Mark.Shannoncreate