Message157847
> Condition variables don't guarantee that there won't be any spurious
> wakeups
What do you mean? The implementation doesn't seem prone to spurious wakeups, and the docs don't say so either.
> I've added two generic tests of Condition objects in their "natural
> environment" as building blocks for bigger things, a Queue and a Lock.
Why would you build a Lock out of a Condition? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-09 15:01:45 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, csernazs, kristjan.jonsson, jyasskin, neologix |
2012-04-09 15:01:45 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1333983705.62.0.724408536439.issue8799@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-04-09 15:01:45 | pitrou | link | issue8799 messages |
2012-04-09 15:01:44 | pitrou | create | |
|