➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Mark.Shannon
Recipients Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jcon, pitrou, pjenvey, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2012-04-06.07:58:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1333699083.97.0.0185704862547.issue13903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
How about changing the method-cache size in a separate patch?

On my machine, reducing the method-cache size from 2**10 to 2**9 results
in a very small improvement in performance (with the original dict). 

That way we don't get a performance regression with the new dict  
and the patch is better focussed.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-04-06 07:58:04Mark.Shannonsetrecipients: + Mark.Shannon, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, pjenvey, benjamin.peterson, jcon, Jim.Jewett
2012-04-06 07:58:03Mark.Shannonsetmessageid: <1333699083.97.0.0185704862547.issue13903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-04-06 07:58:03Mark.Shannonlinkissue13903 messages
2012-04-06 07:58:03Mark.Shannoncreate