This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.araujo
Recipients alexis, eric.araujo, gjb1002, tarek
Date 2012-03-28.04:22:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1332908541.38.0.460687251947.issue10374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I now think that this should be fixed in d1 too.  We could just always rebuild scripts (it’s just a file copy), or implement the matching idea from my previous message.

To answer my own question:
> Or is there a rule that says build_* command only look at timetamps to decide that?
I think a command is free to do whatever inspection it needs to determine is something needs rebuilding.

Tests would need to exercise both the --executable option of build_scripts and default value.  Thankfully the code uses sys.executable and we can inject a custom value in a test.  Adding the easy keyword, I think this is a good candidate for the upcoming Montreal sprint.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-28 04:22:21eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, gjb1002, tarek, alexis
2012-03-28 04:22:21eric.araujosetmessageid: <1332908541.38.0.460687251947.issue10374@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-03-28 04:22:20eric.araujolinkissue10374 messages
2012-03-28 04:22:20eric.araujocreate