Author skrah
Recipients ajaksu2, akuchling, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, meador.inge, skrah, vstinner
Date 2012-03-26.11:43:03
SpamBayes Score 0.010466
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20120326114302.GA19703@sleipnir.bytereef.org>
In-reply-to <1332761705.74.0.677024022847.issue3367@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I only have the C99 standard. It says [5.1.2.2.1]:

  - argv[argc] shall be a NULL pointer.

Is this different in C89?

Also, my patch terminates the *copies* of argv, not argv itself.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-26 11:43:03skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, loewis, akuchling, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, belopolsky, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, ajaksu2, benjamin.peterson, meador.inge
2012-03-26 11:43:03skrahlinkissue3367 messages
2012-03-26 11:43:03skrahcreate