Author skrah
Recipients Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Arfrever, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner
Date 2012-03-21.08:03:29
SpamBayes Score 0.0280889
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> The best thing might be to use Emax=10**8-1 and Emin=-(10**8-1) throughout.
> I don't think many applications depend on having Emax=10**9-1. If they do,
> they'll have to use the 64-bit version.

10**6-1 would be another option. The advantage is that it's visually
obvious that the default exponents have changed.
Date User Action Args
2012-03-21 08:03:31skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, Arfrever, ced, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett
2012-03-21 08:03:30skrahlinkissue7652 messages
2012-03-21 08:03:29skrahcreate