Author tshepang
Recipients bethard, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, tshepang
Date 2012-03-19.08:34:41
SpamBayes Score 1.7969e-13
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <CAA77j2Di0WCnOTihiq=mVCkDt4EO1KV5tGZkLfAN-rYONSixQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1332130663.43.0.872734730459.issue14034@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> A couple of thoughts on the draft HOWTO:
>
> I like the "verbosity" example, but I'd also like to see it continue on into introducing the "action='count'" alternative that allows "-vv" to set the verbosity level to 2, etc.

I wonder if this usage is common enough to get an entry in this
introductory text.

> I also find the idea of having higher verbosity levels that aren't supersets of lower verbosity levels to be an anti-pattern, so I'd prefer not to see it in an official HOWTO. To my mind, verbosity levels should be checked with ">=", never "==".

I don't really understand this paragraph. Do you have an example to
compare with any of the examples in the attached patch?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-19 08:34:42tshepangsetrecipients: + tshepang, ncoghlan, bethard, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, docs@python
2012-03-19 08:34:42tshepanglinkissue14034 messages
2012-03-19 08:34:41tshepangcreate