Message 155619 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	skrah
Recipients	eric.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, python-dev, samuel.iseli, skrah
Date	2012-03-13.14:48:13
SpamBayes Score	0.00011547509
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<20120313144812.GA15591@sleipnir.bytereef.org>
In-reply-to	<20120313143505.GA15416@sleipnir.bytereef.org>

Content
Stefan Krah <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet@bytereef.org> added the comment: > > Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e9b52ceh(v=vs.100).aspx > > Question 1: when doing __control87_2(new, mask, &old, NULL), does the > > resulting value in old reflect the new FPU state or the old one? > > The new one, but I had to test that manually (see below). Well of course, unless both new and mask are 0, in which case it's the existing state.

Stefan Krah <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> 
> Stefan Krah <stefan-usenet@bytereef.org> added the comment:
> 
> Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e9b52ceh(v=vs.100).aspx
> > Question 1:  when doing __control87_2(new, mask, &old, NULL), does the
> > resulting value in old reflect the *new* FPU state or the old one?
> 
> The new one, but I had to test that manually (see below).

Well of course, unless both new and mask are 0, in which case it's
the existing state.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-03-13 14:48:16	skrah	set	recipients: + skrah, jcea, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, python-dev, samuel.iseli
2012-03-13 14:48:13	skrah	link	issue13889 messages
2012-03-13 14:48:13	skrah	create