Author skrah
Recipients Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Arfrever, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner
Date 2012-03-11.11:05:19
SpamBayes Score 0.00045422
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
Benjamin Peterson <> wrote:
> Speaking of inline, the "inline" keyword will have to go because it's not C89.

Actually the trickier instances of "inline" in the .c files are already
suppressed when LEGACY_COMPILER (i.e. C89) is defined. I've now listed the
machine options here:

As I now remember, that was in fact necessary for CompCert. The "static inline"
instances in header files might not be a problem even for embedded compilers,
see e.g.:

IIRC also the Linux kernel uses "static inline" in header files.
Date User Action Args
2012-03-11 11:05:21skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, Arfrever, ced, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett
2012-03-11 11:05:20skrahlinkissue7652 messages
2012-03-11 11:05:19skrahcreate