Author skrah
Recipients Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, Jim.Jewett, Ramchandra Apte, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, casevh, ced, eric.smith, eric.snow, jjconti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner
Date 2012-03-07.12:29:09
SpamBayes Score 0.000104628
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20120307122909.GB4311@sleipnir.bytereef.org>
In-reply-to <1331093383.53.0.464429203652.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> Speaking of inline, the "inline" keyword will have to go because it's not C89.

Do you happen to know a free compiler that builds Python but does not
understand "inline"? I'm asking because without testing you can never
really be sure:

For example I added support for compilers without uint64_t, but
all major compilers (gcc, suncc, icc, VS) of course have uint64_t.

Then I finally found CompCert, and discovered that a couple of
things were missing in the headers.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-07 12:29:10skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, casevh, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, jjconti, ced, Amaury.Forgeot.d'Arc, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte, Jim.Jewett
2012-03-07 12:29:10skrahlinkissue7652 messages
2012-03-07 12:29:09skrahcreate