Author lemburg
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, eric.snow, fx5, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, gz, jcea, lemburg, loewis, mark.dickinson, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, skorgu, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, vstinner, zbysz
Date 2012-02-21.09:50:25
SpamBayes Score 0.000212768
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4F4368DB.80706@egenix.com>
In-reply-to <CAMpsgwYwYv+T_uNF1DeOSRttqrjGowKiFP5_kCBrUY9S3EKp+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content
STINNER Victor wrote:
> 
> STINNER Victor <victor.stinner@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 
>> Question: Should sys.flags.hash_randomization be True (1) when PYTHONHASHSEED=0?  It is now.
>>
>> Saying yes "working as intended" is fine by me.
> 
> It is documented that PYTHONHASHSEED=0 disables the randomization, so
> sys.flags.hash_randomization must be False (0).

PYTHONHASHSEED=1 will disable randomization as well :-)

Only setting PYTHONHASHSEED=random actually enables randomization.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-02-21 09:50:26lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, loewis, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, python-dev, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan, fx5, skorgu
2012-02-21 09:50:25lemburglinkissue13703 messages
2012-02-21 09:50:25lemburgcreate