Author pitrou
Recipients eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, ubershmekel
Date 2012-02-09.23:10:28
SpamBayes Score 0.00163383
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1328828859.3422.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1328828916.12.0.156054342567.issue13968@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> The alternative interpretation of the pattern, that it is fully
> matched against the CWD, takes you back to having to explain what '..'
> means when matched against a given location in the recursion, starting
> with the CWD.  I clearly don't have a good intuition about that.

My alternative interpretation is that the pattern is being matched
against whatever subdir of the current dir (and the current dir itself).
The matching is not different from glob()'s.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-02-09 23:10:29pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, ubershmekel
2012-02-09 23:10:28pitroulinkissue13968 messages
2012-02-09 23:10:28pitroucreate