This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Mark.Shannon
Recipients Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jcon, pitrou, pjenvey, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date 2012-01-31.10:38:16
SpamBayes Score 8.87675e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4F27C496.4030800@hotpy.org>
In-reply-to <1327976241.58.0.481478004965.issue13903@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger@gmail.com> added the comment:
> 
> Changing dictionaries is a big deal.  You're changing many pieces at once (not a good idea) including changing tunable parameters that are well-studied (I spent a month testing whether 5/8 was better idea that 2/3 for resizing or when the ideal small dict size was 4, 8, or 16).  You're changing the meaning of the fields in dictobject.h which will likely break any code that relied on those.
> 
> The ideas may be good ones but they warrant a good deal of thought.  Dicts weren't just slapped together -- the current code is the product to two decades of tweaking by engineers who devoted significant time to the task.  It would be easy to unknowingly undo some of their work.
> 

OK.
I'll write a PEP.

By the way, I'm trying not changing the tunable parameters for the 
unshared-keys case, just the shared-keys case. Of course, they do 
interact with each other.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-01-31 10:38:17Mark.Shannonsetrecipients: + Mark.Shannon, rhettinger, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, pjenvey, benjamin.peterson, jcon
2012-01-31 10:38:17Mark.Shannonlinkissue13903 messages
2012-01-31 10:38:16Mark.Shannoncreate