This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients akitada, akoumjian, alex, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, davide.rizzo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, jacques, jaylogan, jhalcrow, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, mattchaput, moreati, mrabarnett, ncoghlan, nneonneo, pitrou, r.david.murray, ronnix, rsc, sjmachin, steven.daprano, stiv, timehorse, vbr, zdwiel
Date 2012-01-29.07:42:21
SpamBayes Score 8.48833e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
Alex has a valid point in relation to PEP 399, since, like lzma, regex will be coming in under the "special permission" clause that allows the addition of C extension modules without pure Python equivalents. Unlike lzma, though, the new regex engine isn't a relatively simple wrapper around an existing library - supporting the new API features on other implementations is going to mean a substantial amount of work.

In practice, I expect that a pure Python implementation of a regular expression engine would only be fast enough to be usable on PyPy. So while we'd almost certainly accept a patch that added a parallel Python implementation, I doubt it would actually help Jython or IronPython all that much - they're probably going to need versions written in Java and C# to be effective (as I believe they already have for the re module).
Date User Action Args
2012-01-29 07:42:23ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, loewis, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, nneonneo, giampaolo.rodola, rsc, timehorse, mark, vbr, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, steven.daprano, alex, r.david.murray, jacques, zdwiel, jhalcrow, stiv, davide.rizzo, mattchaput, ronnix, eric.snow, akoumjian
2012-01-29 07:42:23ncoghlansetmessageid: <>
2012-01-29 07:42:22ncoghlanlinkissue2636 messages
2012-01-29 07:42:22ncoghlancreate