Message151967
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 18:05 +0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> > I'm attaching a revised version of the patch that should fix the above
> > issue:
> > hybrid-approach-dmalcolm-2012-01-25-002.patch
>
> It looks like that approach will break any non-builtin type (in either C
> or Python) which can compare equal to bytes or str objects. If that's
> the case, then I think the likelihood of acceptance is close to zero.
How?
> Also, the level of complication is far higher than in any other of the
> proposed approaches so far (I mean those with patches), which isn't
> really a good thing.
So would I. I want something I can backport, though. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-01-25 19:19:32 | dmalcolm | set | recipients:
+ dmalcolm, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan, fx5 |
2012-01-25 19:19:31 | dmalcolm | link | issue13703 messages |
2012-01-25 19:19:31 | dmalcolm | create | |
|