This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients Garen, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, fche, glyph, hazmat, jbaker, jcea, jmcp, laca, lasizoillo, loewis, mjw, movement, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, scox, serverhorror, sirg3, techtonik, twleung, wsanchez
Date 2012-01-20.03:31:19
SpamBayes Score 0.018544225
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
I'm -1 on this patch for essentially the same reasons as Charles-François. It introduces a lot of code (and hacks!) in critical pathways of the interpreter. Someone would have to be constantly maintaining and testing it. In return, what do we get?
Date User Action Args
2012-01-20 03:31:20benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, pitrou, wsanchez, movement, techtonik, serverhorror, glyph, laca, twleung, jbaker, robert.kern, sirg3, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, mjw, Garen, neologix, lasizoillo, fche, hazmat, jmcp, scox
2012-01-20 03:31:20benjamin.petersonsetmessageid: <>
2012-01-20 03:31:19benjamin.petersonlinkissue13405 messages
2012-01-20 03:31:19benjamin.petersoncreate