Author lemburg
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, eric.snow, fx5, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, gz, jcea, lemburg, mark.dickinson, neologix, pitrou, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, vstinner, zbysz
Date 2012-01-19.14:37:52
SpamBayes Score 0.000218022
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <1326983393.3395.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou <> added the comment:
>> Please note, that you'd have to extend the randomization to
>> all other Python data types as well in order to reach the same level
>> of security as the collision counting approach.
> You also have to extend the collision counting to sets, by the way.

Indeed, but that's easy, since the set implementation derives from
the dict implementation.
Date User Action Args
2012-01-19 14:37:53lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan, fx5
2012-01-19 14:37:53lemburglinkissue13703 messages
2012-01-19 14:37:52lemburgcreate