Author gvanrossum
Recipients Arach, Arfrever, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, PaulMcMillan, Zhiping.Deng, alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, eric.snow, fx5, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, gz, jcea, lemburg, mark.dickinson, neologix, pitrou, skrah, terry.reedy, tim.peters, v+python, vstinner, zbysz
Date 2012-01-18.23:44:33
SpamBayes Score 8.80744e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Terry J. Reedy <>wrote:

> Terry J. Reedy <> added the comment:
> > As much as the counting idea rubs me wrong,
> FWIW, the original 2003 paper reported that the url-caching system that
> they tested used collision-counting to evade attacks.

You mean as a fix or that they successfully attacked a collision-counting
Date User Action Args
2012-01-18 23:44:34gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, lemburg, tim.peters, barry, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, grahamd, Arfrever, v+python, alex, zbysz, skrah, dmalcolm, gz, neologix, Arach, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, Zhiping.Deng, Huzaifa.Sidhpurwala, Jim.Jewett, PaulMcMillan, fx5
2012-01-18 23:44:34gvanrossumlinkissue13703 messages
2012-01-18 23:44:33gvanrossumcreate