This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author techtonik
Recipients Garen, belopolsky, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, fche, glyph, hazmat, jbaker, jcea, jmcp, laca, lasizoillo, loewis, mjw, movement, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, robert.kern, ronaldoussoren, scox, serverhorror, sirg3, techtonik, twleung, wsanchez
Date 2011-12-12.10:47:02
SpamBayes Score 0.000157667
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <CAPkN8xJfTX7=H2pWYN5Eyja79b=iqsEWAjTnArDKcQDsPXdd2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <CAH_1eM3K2HvO6qM+gps95Am4==cs4HK=rdfAo01tPybXhZ7yNg@mail.gmail.com>
Content
2011/12/12 Charles-François Natali <report@bugs.python.org>

>
> Charles-François Natali <neologix@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> > Alan, I would open a new issue tracking this one and posting a patch
> there, if I were you.
> >
> > Previous DTRACE attempts failed because trying to make everybody happy.
> I don't want to repeat the mistake.
> >
>
> Sorry, but I'm -1.
> I don't feel comfortable with adding a such amount of intrusive code,
> which will have to be maintained as the interpreter evolves, to add
> probes just for Solaris derivatives, which is, with all due respect,
> really a niche platform. So If we merge this, this should at least
> support SystemTap upfront.
>

Is SystemTap an alternative to DTrace? I see that SystemTap is only for
Linux, while DTrace is available also on MacOS and FreeBSD.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-12-12 10:47:03techtoniksetrecipients: + techtonik, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, ronaldoussoren, belopolsky, pitrou, wsanchez, movement, serverhorror, glyph, laca, twleung, jbaker, robert.kern, sirg3, danchr, dhduvall, dmalcolm, mjw, Garen, neologix, lasizoillo, fche, hazmat, jmcp, scox
2011-12-12 10:47:02techtoniklinkissue13405 messages
2011-12-12 10:47:02techtonikcreate