Message148305
+1 Both the -p and --nopath0 would be great additions and a good match for PEP 395.
So "-p ." would be equivalent to the current implicit sys.path[0] initialization, right? Would any other effects happen with "-p" than sys.path[0] initialization? I'll follow up with my one concern (the implicit "-p .") in a follow-up message. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-11-25 06:09:30 | eric.snow | set | recipients:
+ eric.snow, ncoghlan |
2011-11-25 06:09:29 | eric.snow | set | messageid: <1322201369.94.0.963717599819.issue13475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-11-25 06:09:29 | eric.snow | link | issue13475 messages |
2011-11-25 06:09:29 | eric.snow | create | |
|