➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vinay.sajip
Recipients alexis, eric.araujo, flox, francismb, higery, jlove, michael.mulich, nadeem.vawda, paul.moore, pitrou, python-dev, rpetrov, tarek, vinay.sajip, westley.martinez
Date 2011-11-07.18:10:13
SpamBayes Score 1.0555083e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1320689404.11032.YahooMailNeo@web25807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
In-reply-to <1320686043.1.0.243895271263.issue13193@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
>
> That it depends on the architecture currently baffles me.

>

The only explanation I can come up with is that on different machines, the order of the tests might be slightly different. That would allow the flag to be set differently on different machines, based on which other tests have run earlier.

Different ordering could be explained by hash implementations and/or dict bucket sizes being different on different architectures.

>>  Can the distutils/packaging duplication not be avoided?
> No.  They are independent modules.  distutils will die; packaging will be 
> improved and cleaned up.  However, contributors can work on packaging only and 
> leave the gruesome backporting work to me.
> 
>>  IMO the correct cpython fix would address this.
> I don’t understand.

I meant removing the duplication - but from your explanation, I agree that there is no point, since distutils has a limited lifetime.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-11-07 18:10:14vinay.sajipsetrecipients: + vinay.sajip, paul.moore, pitrou, nadeem.vawda, tarek, eric.araujo, rpetrov, flox, alexis, michael.mulich, westley.martinez, python-dev, jlove, higery, francismb
2011-11-07 18:10:13vinay.sajiplinkissue13193 messages
2011-11-07 18:10:13vinay.sajipcreate