Message146392
> I think there is a value to use the very same function names in the
> posix module as in the posix API.
It would still be the case, except that they'd live in distinct submodule.
> The posix API (and C in general) is also flat, and uses the prefix
> convention.
That's because C doesn't have namespaces: it's certainly due to this limitation, and not a design choice (and when you think about it, there is a namespace hierarchy, in the header files: <sys/sched.h>, <attr/xatr.h>, etc.). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-10-25 18:45:23 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, loewis, georg.brandl, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, rosslagerwall, petri.lehtinen |
2011-10-25 18:45:22 | neologix | set | messageid: <1319568322.99.0.352396670297.issue13263@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-10-25 18:45:10 | neologix | link | issue13263 messages |
2011-10-25 18:45:10 | neologix | create | |
|