Message145572
I am a bit surprised this was not part of the original design.
'Tabsize' make 'expand_tabs' redundant and tabsize==0 could be interpreted as expand_tabs==False. On the other hand, the meaning of 'expand_tabs' could be expanded to include the tabsize. I am almost tempted to suggest making expand_tabs > 1 be interpreted as tabsize and make expand_tabs==True(1, the current default) be interpreted as expand_tabs==8 (the new default) for back_compatibility.
Patch as is has new tests and looks good on first reading. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-10-14 23:40:12 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, georg.brandl, john.feuerstein |
2011-10-14 23:40:12 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1318635612.17.0.0504440903398.issue13152@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-10-14 23:40:11 | terry.reedy | link | issue13152 messages |
2011-10-14 23:40:11 | terry.reedy | create | |
|