This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Phillip.M.Feldman@gmail.com
Recipients Phillip.M.Feldman, Phillip.M.Feldman@gmail.com, mark.dickinson, rhettinger
Date 2011-09-12.16:41:02
SpamBayes Score 0.0006483117
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <CAB2ViTZm6WctBR_yU6NOtP7Dty=QUE8qdDWULorCyNG-dfDrYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1315829616.46.0.627999561225.issue12961@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Hello Mark,

This is a fair question.  Suppose that I have three boxes with capacity
limits of 3, 2, and 1, and that there are three balls in total.  Two of the
possible distributions are the following:

2, 0, 1
2, 1, 0

Capacity limits of the individual boxes must be observed when distributing
the balls.  Even though the second and third boxes have different
capacities, we must treat the above two distributions of balls as
equivalent.

Combinatorics problems involving boxes with capacity limits arise in such
application domains as physics and reliability.

Phillip

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:

>
> Mark Dickinson <dickinsm@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> > "unlabelled balls in unlabelled boxes with capacity limits"
>
> What does this mean?  If the boxes are unlabelled, how can they have
> individual capacity limits?  Or do you mean just a single limit that applies
> to all boxes?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +mark.dickinson
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12961>
> _______________________________________
>
Files
File name Uploaded
unnamed Phillip.M.Feldman@gmail.com, 2011-09-12.16:41:01
History
Date User Action Args
2011-09-12 16:41:03Phillip.M.Feldman@gmail.comsetrecipients: + Phillip.M.Feldman@gmail.com, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, Phillip.M.Feldman
2011-09-12 16:41:02Phillip.M.Feldman@gmail.comlinkissue12961 messages
2011-09-12 16:41:02Phillip.M.Feldman@gmail.comcreate