Author Alexander.Belopolsky
Recipients Alexander.Belopolsky, Arfrever, belopolsky, jcea, khenriksson, larry, lars.gustaebel, loewis, mark.dickinson, nadeem.vawda, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, skrah, vstinner
Date 2011-09-09.21:36:54
SpamBayes Score 1.00195e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <CAP7h-xbpZtOrQ7sTYFPV4-sd9sFm5NfLMf=zv2=bq2WFZjiFiQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <CAP7h-xaBOV=FZBk67h89y8_c8RUDrojtAQ78jT=NOHhNuGL_GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> If history repeats, struct stat will grow new st_xtimesuperspec
> fields, st_xtimespec will become a macro expanding to
> st_xtimesuperspec.tv_picosec

On the second thought, this won't work.  To support higher resolution
will need to supply 3 fields in st_xtimesuperspec: tv_sec and tv_nsec
packed in st_xtimespec (say tv_timespec) and new tv_psec field.
st_xtime will now be   st_xtimesuperspec.tv_timespec.tv_sec and
st_xtimespec will be a new macro expanding to
st_xtimesuperspec.tv_timespec.  The rest of my argument still holds.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-09-09 21:36:55Alexander.Belopolskysetrecipients: + Alexander.Belopolsky, loewis, jcea, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, lars.gustaebel, vstinner, larry, nadeem.vawda, Arfrever, r.david.murray, skrah, rosslagerwall, khenriksson
2011-09-09 21:36:55Alexander.Belopolskylinkissue11457 messages
2011-09-09 21:36:54Alexander.Belopolskycreate