Message142477
> D'oh. I just realized why the -M option wasn't being recognized - I had passed it
> after the actual test name, so it was being treated as another test instead of an
> option. Sorry for the confusion :/
>
> As for the actual test results, test_huge_bytes_(32|64)b both pass, but
> test_huge_str fails with this traceback:
Can you replace "_2G" with "_4G" in the decorator for that test? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-08-19 16:58:59 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, alexandre.vassalotti, nadeem.vawda, santoso.wijaya, nyevik, jorgsk |
2011-08-19 16:58:58 | pitrou | link | issue11564 messages |
2011-08-19 16:58:58 | pitrou | create | |
|