Author pitrou
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, jorgsk, nadeem.vawda, nyevik, pitrou, santoso.wijaya
Date 2011-08-19.16:58:58
SpamBayes Score 0.00106472
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1313773006.3549.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1313772494.67.0.0455053697475.issue11564@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> D'oh. I just realized why the -M option wasn't being recognized - I had passed it
> after the actual test name, so it was being treated as another test instead of an
> option. Sorry for the confusion :/
> 
> As for the actual test results, test_huge_bytes_(32|64)b both pass, but
> test_huge_str fails with this traceback:

Can you replace "_2G" with "_4G" in the decorator for that test?
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-19 16:58:59pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, alexandre.vassalotti, nadeem.vawda, santoso.wijaya, nyevik, jorgsk
2011-08-19 16:58:58pitroulinkissue11564 messages
2011-08-19 16:58:58pitroucreate