This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author orsenthil
Recipients belopolsky, catherine, doerwalter, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gpolo, lambacck, orsenthil, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, ron_adam
Date 2011-08-13.00:36:54
SpamBayes Score 0.0003424201
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20110813003645.GA2219@mathmagic>
In-reply-to <1313168123.69.0.38830809068.issue10087@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Hello Éric,

I might have ignored some minor stylistic comments. The '.' in the help text
and , after the last TestName, I am not sure if it is of concern.

I think, to update the stylistic comments, if the submitters (if they
care) could have updated the patch, or a separate commit on style
changes can be done (if they are worth it).

And yeah, it is bad to ignore substantiative comments. I hope, I did
not overlook any. Ezio's main point was he was worried about using
sys.stdout.buffer (as I was too) and we got that clarified. 

Thanks,
Senthil
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-13 00:36:56orsenthilsetrecipients: + orsenthil, doerwalter, georg.brandl, rhettinger, belopolsky, pitrou, ron_adam, gpolo, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, lambacck, r.david.murray, catherine, python-dev
2011-08-13 00:36:55orsenthillinkissue10087 messages
2011-08-13 00:36:54orsenthilcreate