Message140646
Yeah, at the level of *code* the origin doesn't really matter, so re-using the exception type is actually OK. However, for *people* seeing the stack trace, it may be useful to know what's genuinely illegal syntax and what's a limitation of the current implementation. The exception message is a good place for that additional detail. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-07-19 02:11:21 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, loewis, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, orsenthil, marienz, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray, Trundle, eric.snow |
2011-07-19 02:11:21 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1311041481.71.0.997060343487.issue11343@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-07-19 02:11:21 | ncoghlan | link | issue11343 messages |
2011-07-19 02:11:20 | ncoghlan | create | |
|