Author doughellmann
Recipients Santiago.Romero, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, cgwalters, dexen, doughellmann, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, fperez, loewis, mark.dickinson, mcepl, nwerneck, orsenthil, r.david.murray, rhettinger, vstinner
Date 2011-07-18.14:36:32
SpamBayes Score 0.000344243
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
Is unicode supported by shlex in 3.x already? It's curious that unicode support is considered a new feature, rather than a bug. I understand wanting to allocate development resources carefully, though. If someone were to prepare a patch, would it even have a chance of being accepted in 2.7?
Date User Action Args
2011-07-18 14:36:33doughellmannsetrecipients: + doughellmann, loewis, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, orsenthil, vstinner, dexen, benjamin.peterson, cgwalters, mcepl, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, nwerneck, fperez, Santiago.Romero
2011-07-18 14:36:33doughellmannsetmessageid: <>
2011-07-18 14:36:32doughellmannlinkissue1170 messages
2011-07-18 14:36:32doughellmanncreate