➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.araujo
Recipients eric.araujo, mark.dickinson, purpleidea, terry.reedy
Date 2011-07-15.15:31:04
SpamBayes Score 6.944425e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1310743865.89.0.813738867542.issue6786@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> I'd be writing a patch which would allow a programmer the option to
> explicitly use/instantiate the library in a zero-based way. [...]
> Would this be reasonable?

I think not.  Mark already stated his opposition to “a crazy level of micro control”.  Such a patch would not be trivial but would not bring much.

I hope you’ll find other bugs that motivate you for a patch! :)
History
Date User Action Args
2011-07-15 15:31:06eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, purpleidea
2011-07-15 15:31:05eric.araujosetmessageid: <1310743865.89.0.813738867542.issue6786@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-07-15 15:31:05eric.araujolinkissue6786 messages
2011-07-15 15:31:04eric.araujocreate