Message139897
>> We can't do that, it would break existing code.
>
> I would argue that such code is already broken.
>
- that's not necessarily true, if your code is carefully designed
- we can't forbid fork() in a multi-threaded application while it's
allowed by POSIX
- backward compatibility is *really* important
>> What do you mean by helper threads?
>
> multiprocessing uses threads behind the scenes to handle queue traffic and such for individual forked processes. It's something I also wasn't aware of until Antoine pointed it out. It also has its own implementation of atfork hooks in an attempt to handle the locking issue.
>
I'm curious as to how you'll manage to implement
multiprocessing.queues without threads.
Please open a dedicated issue for this. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-07-05 16:33:34 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, nirai, bobbyi, Giovanni.Bajo, sdaoden, avian |
2011-07-05 16:33:33 | neologix | link | issue6721 messages |
2011-07-05 16:33:33 | neologix | create | |
|