Message139769
That's interesting, thanks for your response.
It is also a bit awkward..
Might I recommend adding a note to the documentation? It is not really
intuitive that each child should need to close the end of the pipe it isn't
using (especially since it is possible to create a child that has no
explicit access to that end of the pipe, even though it has inherited the
file descriptor).
2011/7/4 Charles-François Natali <report@bugs.python.org>
>
> Charles-François Natali <neologix@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> That's because the other end of the pipe (p1) is open in the child process
> (FDs are inherited on fork()).
> Just add
> p1.close()
>
> at the beginning of fn() and you'll get EOF.
> Closing as invalid.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +neologix
> resolution: -> invalid
> stage: -> committed/rejected
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12488>
> _______________________________________
> |
File name |
Uploaded |
unnamed
|
lcampagn,
2011-07-04.13:56:21
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-07-04 13:56:22 | lcampagn | set | recipients:
+ lcampagn, neologix |
2011-07-04 13:56:21 | lcampagn | link | issue12488 messages |
2011-07-04 13:56:21 | lcampagn | create | |
|