Message138167
> Perhaps by adding some new argument to the mmap constructor? (dup_fd = True)
I don't really like the idea of exposing the FD duplication to the
user, because:
- it's an implementation detail
- it doesn't reflect any argument of the POSIX mmap version
- it should False by default
I really think that application code expecting to be able to resize
the mmap after closing the FD is broken, but I'm also a really strong
advocate of backward compatibility...
I don't see any satisfying solution. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-06-11 16:40:14 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, georg.brandl, facundobatista, josiahcarlson, pitrou, schmir, eric.araujo, SilentGhost, lorenz |
2011-06-11 16:40:13 | neologix | link | issue10897 messages |
2011-06-11 16:40:13 | neologix | create | |
|