Author baikie
Recipients Andrew.Grover, baikie, brian, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, jackdied, neologix, pitrou, rosslagerwall, synapse, therve, vstinner, wiml
Date 2011-05-23.18:56:29
SpamBayes Score 4.54797e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20110523185628.GA2978@dbwatson.ukfsn.org>
In-reply-to <4DDA2306.4000805@duodecad.hu>
Content
On Mon 23 May 2011, Gergely Kálmán wrote:
> It's been a while I had a look at that code. As far as I remember though 
> the code is fairly decent not
> taking the missing unit tests into account. There are a few todos, and 
> also a pretty bad bug that I've fixed
> but not committed. The TODOs include better parsing of auxiliary data, 
> support for scatter-gather, addressed
> messages. If you wish I can send you the latest patch that has the bug 
> fixed and applies to 3.2.

Erm, have you seen the separately-implemented patch I posted at
http://bugs.python.org/file19962/baikie-hwundram-v5.diff ?  It's
basically complete IIRC.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-05-23 18:56:30baikiesetrecipients: + baikie, exarkun, pitrou, therve, vstinner, jackdied, giampaolo.rodola, synapse, Andrew.Grover, wiml, neologix, rosslagerwall, brian
2011-05-23 18:56:29baikielinkissue6560 messages
2011-05-23 18:56:29baikiecreate